Note to Nick Clegg: put your foot down and insist on benefit rise

Last year, Nick Clegg defied Tory wishes and insisted that benefits were raised in line with inflation, as Nick Thornsby wrote at the time. 

Living on benefits is no joke. If you’re getting £71 a week Job Seekers’ Allowance and things cost 2.4% more this year than they did last year, that’s £1.70 per week that just disappears. The poorest are the last people who can afford to lose any amount of money. 
That’s why it’s important that the meagre amount they get at least keeps pace with the way prices are going up.
Food prices are predicted to go up significantly this year after a poor grain harvest in the US. This is going to have horrendous consequences in poorer countries, but it will affect us here, too. Basic foodstuffs, nothing flashy, will cost more. 
Strangely enough, the Tories are apparently now making noises that they want to freeze benefits for two years and then only put them up in line with average earnings. That’s what Tories do.
Nick Clegg must put his foot down again and he must succeed. I know that’s not necessarily going to be easy but failure is not an option. If money needs to be found from somewhere, it can be found from the wealthiest. The poor can take no more.

About caronlindsay

Scottish Lib Dem internationalist, mum, LGBT+ ally, Doctor Who, Strictly, F1 and trashy tv addict and blogger. Servant to two spaniels. She/her.
This entry was posted in Benefits, inflation, Nick Clegg, Nick Thornsby. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Note to Nick Clegg: put your foot down and insist on benefit rise

  1. Andrew says:

    I completely agree with everything you've written. I can only hope that Nick Clegg heeds your very sensible advice!


  2. ffhfhffh says:

    I'm curious whether you think it be worth doing in exchange for a wealth tax along the lines of a mansion tax or similar?

    You could argue that the introduction of a wealth tax could have a positive impact on making taxation fairer and more progressive for decades, whereas the negative impact of benefits reduction in real terms for the next two years will have a more temporary impact.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.